Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Наблюдательная поза пищухи.jpg

File:Наблюдательная поза пищухи.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2017 at 14:17:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Наблюдательная поза пищухи.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Наблюдательная поза пищухи.jpg

1140

901

123

77

3167

2310

e.g. low DOF

2096

1902

177

154

3167

2310

e.g. noise

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
•  Info created by Юрий Емельянов - uploaded by Юрий Емельянов - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 14:17, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- JukoFF (talk) 14:17, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Well done, and cute. --Yann (talk) 15:07, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment High education value (we don't have many QI of this animal), good composition, nice light and colors. Could be sharper, but still OK for me. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:22, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very nice but poor quality. --Hockei (talk) 15:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - Poor quality how? To me, it looks like a good composition and a pretty good photo of the pika, though not quite pinpoint sharp at full size, and I would support it unless you can show me some major fault. Are you seeing an artificial border around it or something? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

It is very noisy and the DOF is too low (see note). --Hockei (talk) 16:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - Thanks. I've considered your specific objections but don't find these drawbacks nearly as big to me as they are to you. I still consider this to deserve a moderate level of support for a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose per Hockei. At first I thought it could be improved with a crop, but there are still plenty of issues around the animal's head. Daniel Case (talk) 23:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. -- Colin (talk) 07:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose as per others. Daphne Lantier 19:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- HalfGig talk 03:27, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I like it. --Karelj (talk) 20:18, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Really nice composition but technical quality too low. Charles (talk) 12:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 23:35, 12 August 2017 (UTC)