Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Поперечный срез стебля Ginkgo biloba.jpg

File:Поперечный срез стебля Ginkgo biloba.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2016 at 11:24:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Поперечный срез стебля Ginkgo biloba.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Поперечный срез стебля Ginkgo biloba.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
•  Info created by Anatoly Mikhaltsov - uploaded by Anatoly Mikhaltsov - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 11:24, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- JukoFF (talk) 11:24, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 17:03, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support CA could be removed, and some mistakes, but seems interesting.--Mile (talk) 18:09, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Valid blank background. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Quite interesting and pretty, but it would probably be good to decrease the brightness a bit, given the amount of white in the picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:16, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:10, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --El Grafo (talk) 08:28, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose I think Kruusamägi below is right: looks very pixelated at full resolution. I'd guess it was upscaled for processing and then accidentally not downscaled again afterwards. Currently, it can't hold up with similar pictures quality-wise, so it fails the "one of our finest" criterion. --El Grafo (talk) 11:56, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

•  Qualified support per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 19:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:46, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose This image here is an excellent example of a good image, but the one nominated here on the other hand has posterization, some weird sharp lines and purple fringing. Considering the image size some downsizing might be necessary (how exactly did this image ended up with 62 MP size? upscaling?). This image from the same author is more suitable as a FP in my opinion. Kruusamägi (talk) 12:53, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support ------Isasza (talk) 13:46, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 19:26, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 10:36, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
•  SupportMö1997 (Questions ?!?!) 12:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 01:17, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants