Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016 Sony DSLR-A700.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:2016 Sony DSLR-A700.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2016 at 18:52:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:52, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:52, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Oppose DoF problem --The Photographer 18:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)- Dont see any DoF problems, but if you can remove some dust it would be good. --Mile (talk) 20:38, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Mile:
Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:30, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Mile:
Comment I think I would have cleaned the camera a bit better before I took such a photo. That big thumb print on the lens (among other dust and dirt) is not very attractive. --cart-Talk 23:11, 15 December 2016 (UTC)- Oppose Per The Photographer and cart. Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. Rightfully QI and VI but not quite FP. lNeverCry 07:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support I removed fingerprint. Think its ok.--Mile (talk) 09:02, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Mile, I don't approve of you editing someone else's FP nomination. There is no rush. Please permit Jacek to make any modifications he wants. Your edit has also removed a lot of EXIF information from the file. Editing JPGs is always sub-optimal and quite unnessary here. This isn't a Flickr transfer by some external photographer. Just leave other people's photos alone unless they ask for your help. -- Colin (talk) 10:55, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I think such product shots, unless antique, need to be spotless (compare File:Sony-Alpha-A700-Front.jpg). I think for Commons FP, a photo like this needs to be more than just an ebay auction photo, but demonstrate good lighting control and engaging approach. -- Colin (talk) 09:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - I basically agree with the others, including The Photographer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:31, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- I would like to note that DoF is IMO certainly not a problem here. Commons is the only place where you will find people focus-stacking product shots in order to prevent pixel peeping comments about DoF. There's plenty DoF here. -- Colin (talk) 10:55, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Colin I added a note because I am not sure if this out of focus is a DoF problem --The Photographer 11:53, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- User:The Photographer, it is out of focus because the DoF doesn't reach the far corner, though one needs to look at 100% to see this. Whether you think this is a "problem" is debatable and subjective. I think Commons is too demanding wrt product shots being in focus front-to-back -- more demanding than real world photos of products by professionals. -- Colin (talk) 12:50, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Colin I added a note because I am not sure if this out of focus is a DoF problem --The Photographer 11:53, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Reverted. --Mile (talk) 14:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:10, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /lNeverCry 21:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
