Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Akademie Mont-Cenis-Sonnenuntergang-2016.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2016 at 16:30:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Info Although both nominations are of the same object at the same time, the perspective is very different justifying both nominations. If you disagree, please let me know.
all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 16:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC) - Support --Tuxyso (talk) 16:32, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support Wow! Congratulations, Tuxyso! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:51, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support I find this image more valuable than the other one. Nice capture. Anand2202 (talk) 17:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support INeverCry 17:53, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support The two nominations are relevant, no worry. I support this one.--Jebulon (talk) 21:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:51, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Ali Zifan 02:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support - I much prefer this picture, partly because the fence provides a great counterpoint to the building that's lacking in the other photo and partly because the sky is magnificent in this picture and good but not so striking in the other one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:59, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support This could also go in the Natural Phenomena/Reflections category -- Thennicke (talk) 05:44, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support both images are great! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support − Meiræ 07:57, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!) 10:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support very nice! Great color, excellent lines. Atsme 📞 14:16, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:57, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Zcebeci (talk) 22:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Even better than the other one. The area around the dusk is a little waxy but so much else in this potentially problematic image worked. If this were the album cover, I'd probably buy it just for that (but after all, any band that would use this as album cover is probably the sort of band I'd like anyway). If this were the cover of a company's annual report, I'd consider investing. Daniel Case (talk) 19:54, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:07, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support The glass... --★ Poké95 09:46, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Albertus teolog (talk) 04:06, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 01:05, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture