Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Azerbajiani landscape - Another version.jpg

File:Azerbajiani landscape - Another version.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2011 at 14:10:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Azerbajiani landscape - Another version.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Azerbajiani landscape - Another version.jpg

•  Info Created by Matthew Hadley (nickname diff_sky) - uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by Azeri -- Azeri (talk) 14:10, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Azeri (talk) 14:10, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Looking good ;) --Ximonic (talk) 15:04, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Same excellent composition, much better contrast and colours. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:42, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Snaevar (talk) 22:00, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Steven Walling 05:51, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- aghith 07:05, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support It's small, and on top of that, the quality is soso, but I like the colours and composition - Benh (talk) 10:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support featured composition --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:06, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Soso quality renders unfeaturable. W.S. 14:15, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Could you please say what is wrong with the quality (e.g. white balance is wrong, noisy, etc.)? Saying, "bad quality, it cannot be featured" is no more helpful than saying, "I hate it". --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:15, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Question Could you add geocodes and info about summits? And cut this man from the photo? It is "lovely" postcard now. Przykuta → [edit] 16:04, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

• Partly  Done: I add a couple of summits and coordinates after a while of searching. If you know there is something to correct, please do so. --Ximonic (talk) 15:28, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

•  Support This is just great --Alakbaroff (talk) 16:40, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- MJJR (talk) 19:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:35, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Looks dramatic. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:01, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Murdockcrc (talk) 15:56, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Question I would like to know in which rayon this valley is situated. The coordinates don't help me finding it, but its needed for a categorization by rayon. --Don-kun (talk) 07:39, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
  • The valley is located in the Quba Rayon , but I dont understand what you mean by categorization. Azeri (talk) 11:44, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
    • It is for the same purpose as the subdivisional categorization in other countries. Like these examples of Switzerland: Category:Subdivisions of Switzerland / Category:Cantons of Switzerland / Category:Canton of Valais. Just another way to search the images. --Ximonic (talk) 13:30, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
      •  Done Oke I understand, thanks. I adjusted the categorization to Quba and Xınalıq. Azeri (talk) 09:48, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Nice picture. --Stryn (talk) 16:05, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Lošmi (talk) 03:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Great! --Simonizer (talk) 09:45, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:59, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural