Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bainingsfiredancer.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Bainingsfiredancer.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2011 at 07:44:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Taro Taylor - uploaded by File Upload Bot - nominated by Elekhh -- ELEKHHT 07:44, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- ELEKHHT 07:44, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support No way other than support, nice image -- aghith 09:28, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Murdockcrc (talk) 09:40, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Fire strongly overexposed, not very nice shadow from flash. -- /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ 苦情処理係 10:55, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Niabot, looks like plastic fire. --Yikrazuul (talk) 17:02, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Very cool effect. "Overexposed fire"? Really? -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 16:08, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Comment A very good example, that fire doesn't need to be overexposed: File:Fire breathing 2 Luc Viatour.jpg -- /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ 苦情処理係 16:27, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- I guess the histogram is just a liar then. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 17:22, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- A histogram often lies. Just because it's not suitable to show all defects inside images. It's a very strong simplification that misses some important facts. Try to create a plot with a vectorscope or a waveform diagram. Both are able to tell you the story of an image in a much better way. But in this case even the histogram shows the issue. You will find a strong peak on the right. The result of clipping higher values, creating many #ffffff. -- /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ 苦情処理係 18:25, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- ...The histogram also showed clipping in the image you claim is superior to this one also, and it should. Half of what fire is is light, it doesn't make sense to claim that a fire in a picture is overexposed more than it would make sense to say the Sun is too hot or water is too wet - it's seems to me just to be an excuse for an oppose. Anyway, you can look at the image and clearly see that many different temperature regions in the fire are shown. If it was really overexposed I might expect to see the entire thing as a ball of yellowish white. A different filter might've masked some of the brightness of the light though and I wonder if perhaps you're seeing white because of the auto white balance. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 03:55, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- The color value #ffffff is pure white. How should it be something else? Even the sun can be filmed without overexposure. That is not an argument. Did i also mention the harsh flashlight shadows? Oh, yes i did. That are two good reason to oppose. -- /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ 苦情処理係 09:25, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- ...The histogram also showed clipping in the image you claim is superior to this one also, and it should. Half of what fire is is light, it doesn't make sense to claim that a fire in a picture is overexposed more than it would make sense to say the Sun is too hot or water is too wet - it's seems to me just to be an excuse for an oppose. Anyway, you can look at the image and clearly see that many different temperature regions in the fire are shown. If it was really overexposed I might expect to see the entire thing as a ball of yellowish white. A different filter might've masked some of the brightness of the light though and I wonder if perhaps you're seeing white because of the auto white balance. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 03:55, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- A histogram often lies. Just because it's not suitable to show all defects inside images. It's a very strong simplification that misses some important facts. Try to create a plot with a vectorscope or a waveform diagram. Both are able to tell you the story of an image in a much better way. But in this case even the histogram shows the issue. You will find a strong peak on the right. The result of clipping higher values, creating many #ffffff. -- /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ 苦情処理係 18:25, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- I guess the histogram is just a liar then. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 17:22, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Comment A very good example, that fire doesn't need to be overexposed: File:Fire breathing 2 Luc Viatour.jpg -- /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ 苦情処理係 16:27, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose nothing special, not good for FP. ■ MMXX talk 17:45, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results: