Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Breeding Indian Pond Heron.jpg

File:Breeding Indian Pond Heron.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 May 2011 at 20:03:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Breeding Indian Pond Heron.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Breeding Indian Pond Heron.jpg

•  Info created by Manjithkaini - uploaded by Manjithkaini - nominated by Praveenp -- Praveen:talk 20:03, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Praveen:talk 20:03, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo 00:52, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment Lack of details on the lower feathers. --Mbdortmund 10:13, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very noisy and nothing exactly in focus. W.S. 14:32, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per W.S.--Snaevar (talk) 20:01, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose W.S. said it all. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 04:31, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment I just spent 2 days in a swamp photographig wildlife. Birds are very hard to photograph, for they don´t like humans encroaching on them. This photograph is a good photograph in general terms, and while it lacks sharpness at 100%, when viewd at smaller size, which is how it will be reproduced anyway, it is definitely acceptable. To expect things to be razor sharp all the time is not necessrily neither good policy nor good photography. Just as enlarging film negatives eventually produce grain and degraded quality, so do digital images. It is all about reproduction size and viewing distance. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:07, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

•  Support -- aghith 08:00, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:42, 9 May 2011 (UTC)