Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Capitol at Dusk 2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Capitol at Dusk 2.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2013 at 08:55:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info all by -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:55, 13 September 2013 (UTC). New image of my capitol series that might be better than the nomination I've already withdrawn.
- Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:55, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- Support Noise stacking would help, but I think it's really good now. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 13:37, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- Neutral I've been looking more closely at the photograph. Pixelation is observed widespread, particularly in lampposts. Additionally perspective deformation of the corners. An excessive amount of noise reduction in certain places that make losing detail. --The Photographer (talk) 14:15, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Well, especially the border resolution of the EF-17-40 at the very short end is mediocre at best. I had to stop down to f/11 to obtain at least some level of details. Nevertheless I consider this image superior to my first nomination, to me it appears simply more balanced as a whole. Removing people was also relatively easy in this case. ;-) Nevertheless, thanks for your input! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:02, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment There's something about the quality and details, I would say aggressive noise reduction (when only should be in the shadows) and oversharpening additional noise in the sky--The Photographer (talk) 17:39, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Well, especially the border resolution of the EF-17-40 at the very short end is mediocre at best. I had to stop down to f/11 to obtain at least some level of details. Nevertheless I consider this image superior to my first nomination, to me it appears simply more balanced as a whole. Removing people was also relatively easy in this case. ;-) Nevertheless, thanks for your input! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:02, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- Neutral Sorry, fine details are smeared. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:51, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- Support I hate the fucking pixel peeping that goes on here. Brilliant photo. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:40, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 23:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Support Seems better than File:US Capitol Building at night Jan 2006.jpg. JKadavoor Jee 17:25, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Joydeep Talk 18:18, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful --PierreSelim (talk) 22:00, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:10, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Felix König ✉ 10:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Support Kruusamägi (talk) 17:05, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Support I love the composition and colours, good work --Kurkoe (talk) 02:30, 20 September 2013 (BST)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture