Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chacaltaya Pano MC.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Chacaltaya Pano MC.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2010 at 03:13:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created and uploaded by Chmehl - nominated by 99of9 -- 99of9 (talk) 03:13, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Since Chmehl's other pano got such a great response, I'll put in another one of his that I think is fabulous. -- 99of9 (talk) 03:13, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Bidgee (talk) 05:16, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Very nice panorama --George Chernilevsky talk 07:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Excellent work! Very nice light and lots of details because of the high resolution. --MattiPaavola (talk) 09:52, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Good nom :) Good image --Herby talk thyme 11:42, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support fantastic panorama. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:36, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:54, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support LiveChocolate (talk) 22:33, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Pretty. Tiptoety talk 06:32, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Good. Takabeg (talk) 11:59, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Great sharpness, a very impressive landscape. There is a bit too much of the foreground imo, but this is a personal feeling. --Cayambe (talk) 14:29, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special... IMO just a panorama, the composition isn't superp anyway. —kallerna™ 14:42, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Taken from an altitude of 5421m is nothing special? Bringing a tripod and a pano head to this height is quite special IMO. I mean, fair enough if the composition lead you to opposing, but calling it nothing special seems for me a little rude. --Slaunger (talk) 22:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose, as Kallerna - ordinary composition. --Aqwis (talk) 18:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Darius Baužys → talk 06:16, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support--elemaki (talk) 20:38, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:31, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Weak support Difficult. If it had been described as a pano of the alps, I would not have been very impressed by the composition. The image as such, although technically perfect, does not impress me in terms of esthetics. But on the other hand, 5421m makes it special. Nevertheless it would be great if the author could add image notes to point out which city is which. Nikopol (talk) 00:59, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Brackenheim (talk) 15:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Rastrojo (D•ES) 14:45, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Roke (talk) 11:20, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas