Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chaplin The Kid.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Chaplin The Kid.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2014 at 21:03:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Unknown (Publicity photo for "The Kid") - uploaded by Jbarta - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 21:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 21:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support Iconic. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:12, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support per King. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:27, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support A posterchild for FP. Iconic, indeed. Kleuske (talk) 10:48, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support Can not resist. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:57, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support Moi non plus. This one is good as it is, IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 09:27, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:18, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Joydeep Talk 07:54, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support --P e z i (talk) 15:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose for the sake of alt. Jee 02:39, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Child labour.--Claus (talk) 13:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]- Info an edit by Crisco 1492, with some more restoration. Tomer T (talk) 18:20, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 18:20, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Comment The is an uncontroversial edit and would recommend you just upload over the original. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:18, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- I did not do so as the image was up for FP, and thus (in case there were issues) I wanted others to have a chance to easily compare them. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:46, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Understood. You did an excellent job of repairing the large scratch but otherwise the two images are identical, hence my suggestion. Saffron Blaze (talk) 00:04, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- I was referring to the de-artefacting I did on the JPG, actually. A little bit of detail appears to have been lost. I don't think it's a significant amount of detail, but others may disagree. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:27, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Understood. You did an excellent job of repairing the large scratch but otherwise the two images are identical, hence my suggestion. Saffron Blaze (talk) 00:04, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support but also pro uploading this over the other version. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 09:31, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support If for the simple fact that there are still some large scratches in the first image. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:00, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 19:08, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 20:27, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:05, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support and suggest people who voted on both to choose one. Jee 06:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- Why? Tomer T (talk) 19:08, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- Makes closing easier. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:23, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- Yes; now both of them have 9 supports. So the closer need to toss a coin. :) Jee 02:38, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Makes closing easier. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:23, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- Why? Tomer T (talk) 19:08, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support Poco2 21:34, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Claus (talk) 13:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Ricardo Esteban Gutierrez (talk) 15:42, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical
The chosen alternative is: File:Chaplin The Kid edit.jpg