Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dinoceras mirabile Marsh MNHN.jpg

File:Dinoceras mirabile Marsh MNHN.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2010 at 18:19:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dinoceras mirabile Marsh MNHN.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dinoceras mirabile Marsh MNHN.jpg

•  Info all by me , restoration and given to the Museum by Professor Marsh in 1889 -- Jebulon (talk) 18:19, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Very interesting specimen (cast), concerned by the "funny" Bone Wars. That's why it has two names, Uinthaterium anceps (Leidy 1872) and Dinoceras mirabile (Marsh 1872), still so named in the Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle of Paris.-- Jebulon (talk) 18:19, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:29, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 22:11, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--Miguel Bugallo 23:41, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:57, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The Photographer (talk) 14:16, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:25, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
• Conditional  Support high ev. please reconsider working on the levels again - mere black as backgroundcolour is more convincing than this dark greyish tone. moreover some spots are left deriving from masking (?). regards, PETER WEIS TALK 08:18, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment thanks for the changes. regards, PETER WEIS TALK 00:52, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 16:24, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
• weak immaterially  Oppose: unfavourable light conditions (your new version is better, but imo not perfect) and I'm unconvinced with the composition (crop at the right is strange). Sorry... --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:45, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
  • . We had "weak/strong support" and "weak/strong oppose", which does not mean anything IMO, and now, we have "weak immaterially oppose". Somebody suggested that a "weak something" should count for a half vote... "weak immaterially something" is now a "quarter vote" ? We are living in a modern era... For next time, I suggest "nano support" and "almost oppose". Let's play. strong--Jebulon (talk) 23:40, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Or we use femto-support, nano-support, micro-support, support, kilo-support, giga-support, etc., and we record the decimal logarithm of the expression to establish the final score. Rama (talk) 07:20, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

• 5  Support (i.e. between a support and a deca-support), acting on my proposal above. Rama (talk) 07:20, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
  • J'avais déjà proposé le "nano support". Sois à c'qu'on t'dit ! Et encore, on est gentil, on reste dans le système décimal...Imagine un truc avec le système impérial...--Jebulon (talk) 10:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mbz1 (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects