Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Early flight 02562u.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Early flight 02562u.jpg, featured
[edit]
Voting period ends on 2 Mar 2009 at 04:56:38
Info created by Romanet & cie., imp. edit.- uploaded by Trialsanderrors - nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:56, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:56, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Comment I have to admit I was quite surprised this wasn't featured already - I would have sworn it was - but as it's not... Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:56, 21 February 2009 (UTC)- Support --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 07:35, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Karel (talk) 09:10, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Lošmi (talk) 21:32, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Mbz1 (talk) 05:19, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support --S. Martín (talk) 14:45, 22 February 2009 (UTC).
- Support —kallerna™ 19:29, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Tiago Fioreze (talk) 21:24, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Oppose. Unsharp; technical inaccuracies. See comments here.[1] Durova (talk) 03:37, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- The comment you link to is about a picture which is not part of this sheet as far as I can see. What is your point then? In any case I see the candidate picture rather as a piece of art than an exact depiction in all detail. It is sufficiently sharp in my opinion. bamse (talk) 13:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Starscream (talk) 09:05, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support bamse (talk) 13:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Question What does the "02562u" in the filename stand for? bamse (talk) 13:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Library of Congress reference number. If you downloaded it from the Library of Congress, at http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.02562 the filename would be 02562u.tif. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:04, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- I see. On the loc-site I get a "No records were found for the search." message though. Maybe a temporary problem. The candidate image could have a more descriptive filename. bamse (talk) 16:04, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- There's a lot of sections on the LoC site - it may be that the tag's linking to the wrong one. I'll poke into it later on. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:25, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- No need, it works now. bamse (talk) 19:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- There's a lot of sections on the LoC site - it may be that the tag's linking to the wrong one. I'll poke into it later on. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:25, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- I see. On the loc-site I get a "No records were found for the search." message though. Maybe a temporary problem. The candidate image could have a more descriptive filename. bamse (talk) 16:04, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Library of Congress reference number. If you downloaded it from the Library of Congress, at http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.02562 the filename would be 02562u.tif. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:04, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
result: 9 supports, 2 opposes, 0 neutral => featured. Benh (talk) 21:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
