Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flamant rose Salines de Thyna.jpg

File:Flamant rose Salines de Thyna.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2016 at 07:23:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Flamant rose Salines de Thyna.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flamant rose Salines de Thyna.jpg

1181

1760

90

81

2344

2708

Dust spot? -- Slaunger (talk) 20:05, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
•  Info 50px|link=User:ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2/Nomination of featured images on Arabic Wikipedia Project Featured picture on Arabic Wikipedia.created by Elgollimoh - uploaded by Elgollimoh - nominated by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:23, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:23, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment - That's a good bird picture, and though it's not as big a file nor as detailed as many pictures of birds we've been featuring, I'm inclined to support it, partly because I appreciate the smooth background. However, I think there may be some more or less light small spots that were on the lens and, if so, they should be edited out before I vote for this picture. For example, I see some below the flamingo and above the water. If I'm right, there are unfortunately quite a few of them. I don't speak of the air bubbles in the water - those are quite evident and fine. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek: Try to open the image from another device.You may see more purity.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:43, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Using another device is not an option for me. I cleared my cache and then opened the updated file. I still see what look like dust spots or water on the lens. I repeated the process a second time, clearing the cache and opening the updated file. The results were the same. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:32, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: If this problem appears simply click on refresh (or reload) in your browser. Either in the project page or in the opened picture. That should be all. --Hockei (talk) 17:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment I miss further information on the file page, which just describes it as a 'greater flamingo'. I see from the categorization that this greater flamingo has been photographed in Tunesia, but where? A geolocation would add value. Maybe the creator Elgollimoh could provide this further information? -- Slaunger (talk) 13:19, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
  • I've added "near Thyna (Tunisia)". –Be..anyone 💩 15:05, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Thanks, master detective Be..anyone. Out of curiosity, how come you know it has been taken near Thyna? -- Slaunger (talk) 19:48, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
      • Cheating, of course, I put the Arab text into Google translate, got "Tine", and adopted "Thyna" from the existing French + Ukrainian description. –Be..anyone 💩 19:52, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
        • That is not cheating, that is being smart! -- Slaunger (talk) 20:03, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
•  weak support The light and pose is really very good on this one. Resolution satisfactory, but not impressive. I agree with Ikan Kekek though that there appears to be either a few dust spots and/or water droplets on the lens. I have annotated the most distracting one in the nomination page. A minor issue for me though. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:10, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose, pending cleanup of dust or water-on-lens spots, which bother me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:17, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose not wow for me Jiel (talk) 22:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral pending cleanup of dust spot. Daniel Case (talk) 06:00, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 20:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)