Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Floral motif floor tile.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Floral motif floor tile.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2014 at 04:45:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by MoTorleeb - uploaded by MoTorleeb - nominated by MoTorleeb -- MoTorleeb (talk) 04:45, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Oppose sorry, motive with no wow. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:03, 29 May 2014 (UTC)- Oppose And for such a plane object the focus is too soft as well and the light too dull. Moreover, I think it should be added to the file page where the photo was taken. --Slaunger (talk) 22:39, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Comment i respectfully disagree with both your objections. 1) The focus might appear soft only because the colours themselves are used in such a manner as to give the impression that they are blurry, rather than well delineated. 2) i took the photo with unobstructed light shining from above and still brightened the image a little to more accurately render its colour. If you are under the impression that the "white" parts of the photo are actually white then you are mistaken. --MoTorleeb (talk) 05:44, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for you explanation. The colors are indeed washed out on the tiles themselves, which gives a false impression of the photo being very much soft in focus. In a few places, there are flakes, which has fallen out, where you get a better impression of the focus, and I do not think it is good enough for FP for this kind of plane object, where it is easy to get a near-perfect focal distance to all parts of the surface. I was not under the impression that the whitish parts should be white. Thanks for explaining about the light source. Good that you have given this thought and effort. But still the end result does not have the wow I expect for an FP, sorry. And still, the file page could use more information about the tiles themselves. It is not only the photo we are reviewing, but also the metadata and how easy it will be for people to find exactly these tiles if they look for them for a specific purpose. --Slaunger (talk) 06:26, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Despite our differences, i appreciate your taking the time to explain your opinions, as well as giving me some advice.MoTorleeb (talk) 07:01, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for you explanation. The colors are indeed washed out on the tiles themselves, which gives a false impression of the photo being very much soft in focus. In a few places, there are flakes, which has fallen out, where you get a better impression of the focus, and I do not think it is good enough for FP for this kind of plane object, where it is easy to get a near-perfect focal distance to all parts of the surface. I was not under the impression that the whitish parts should be white. Thanks for explaining about the light source. Good that you have given this thought and effort. But still the end result does not have the wow I expect for an FP, sorry. And still, the file page could use more information about the tiles themselves. It is not only the photo we are reviewing, but also the metadata and how easy it will be for people to find exactly these tiles if they look for them for a specific purpose. --Slaunger (talk) 06:26, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per Slaunger -- Christian Ferrer Talk 06:43, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 09:35, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
