Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Florence Duomo from Michelangelo hill.jpg

File:Florence Duomo from Michelangelo hill.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2015 at 15:06:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Florence Duomo from Michelangelo hill.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Florence Duomo from Michelangelo hill.jpg

•  Info Florence Duomo from Michelangelo hill. All by PetarM -- Mile (talk) 15:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Did prefer little wider crop but some strong ligth were there. -- Mile (talk) 15:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Code (talk) 19:34, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl (talk) 00:32, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:46, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice. --Σπάρτακος (talk) 12:24, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support — Julian H.^✈ 14:32, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Yann (talk) 15:12, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support More good pictures of the Florence Duomo! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:50, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Question Am I right that there are JPG artifacts? At the top of the tower? --XRay ^talk 19:16, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Done XRay,♦ Some celaning of noise and few artefacts. Check now. --Mile (talk) 08:12, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
    •  Oppose Nice image, but it looks still posterized. IMO there is a problem with too much JPEG compression. Additionally there are halos.--XRay ^talk 07:00, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose. Nice photo, but the image is not particularly sharp, there are sharpening halos (esp. on the left), and there is too much pitch black. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with KoH, with regrets.--Jebulon (talk) 20:29, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Soundwaweserb (talk) 20:48, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per the King. Looks like many details have gone away during post processing. A striking picture at thumbnail though. Wouldn't be too sad if it's promoted. - Benh (talk) 21:25, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 19:05, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I like the light and composition. Shame it isn't higher resolution. I don't really see a problem with the original and the later version smudges the clouds and the top of the buildings so I would be more careful with masking out the softening you've applied to the sky. -- Colin (talk) 20:26, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer 19:45, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /KTC (talk) 10:04, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings