Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Halde Rheinpreußen, Grubenlampe, III retouched.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2010 at 18:08:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info all by Carschten
- Support as creator --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:08, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Centered composition, bad crop, nothing too special. Sorry. —kallerna™ 19:39, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- what do you mean with centered composition? I choose this crop because you see the hole mining lamp and you can think where it was biult (on a hill and with industry around). Nothing special: it's a 28 meters high monument where you have a large view (see point crop) so I think there could be a wow. I tried to show it on the photo. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:05, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Comment With the crop I meant the crop of the car. —kallerna™ 11:47, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- better? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:28, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Yep. But IMO still not good enough to be FP. Needs something extra (maybe better lightning, better time of year, better weather or something). Now it just doesn't stand out of other photos. —kallerna™ 15:59, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- at Germen Wikipedia we talked at the moment about that I should let the power stations make Buuuuuum!!! at next time for a better background. Sounds it better? But more serious: lighting is good, whatever time of year, and trough my nonexistent glasses I see a wonderful weather. What want you more? The only thing I can do is going to the Halde in summer and make a night portrait --> File:Halde Rheinpreußen, Grubenlampe, Nacht, II.jpg. But for a day shot I do not know what I can correctetd... --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:25, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- I don't want to get into some silly discussions on "wow" and stuff but... It is a stunning piece of architecture and I'm glad I've seen it now. However I think you could try for a different time of day (early/late). I think you could avoid getting the car park in. I'd be tempted to try a little more distance and a little closer (if you are stitching it won't be a big problem). No idea if that helps but it is intended too --Herby talk thyme 16:37, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- at Germen Wikipedia we talked at the moment about that I should let the power stations make Buuuuuum!!! at next time for a better background. Sounds it better? But more serious: lighting is good, whatever time of year, and trough my nonexistent glasses I see a wonderful weather. What want you more? The only thing I can do is going to the Halde in summer and make a night portrait --> File:Halde Rheinpreußen, Grubenlampe, Nacht, II.jpg. But for a day shot I do not know what I can correctetd... --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:25, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Yep. But IMO still not good enough to be FP. Needs something extra (maybe better lightning, better time of year, better weather or something). Now it just doesn't stand out of other photos. —kallerna™ 15:59, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- better? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:28, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Comment With the crop I meant the crop of the car. —kallerna™ 11:47, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- what do you mean with centered composition? I choose this crop because you see the hole mining lamp and you can think where it was biult (on a hill and with industry around). Nothing special: it's a 28 meters high monument where you have a large view (see point crop) so I think there could be a wow. I tried to show it on the photo. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:05, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:45, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- could you tell me why? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:48, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- It is not bad enough to give an oppose vote, but it isn't magnificent either. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:37, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Okay. Could you tell me what I could make better in a next time? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:28, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- It is not bad enough to give an oppose vote, but it isn't magnificent either. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:37, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- could you tell me why? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:48, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I want to vote on this one but I'm not sure which way :) For now I would say that it is an interesting object (I dislike the wow word - much misunderstood) but I'm not sure that means that a photo of it is featurable. I'll get back to this one. --Herby talk thyme 12:32, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Question copyright ? ----Jebulon (talk) 23:24, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- It's cool. Rocket000 (talk) 06:09, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for answering. Lucky Germans...--Jebulon (talk) 23:07, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support Strange comments here, it's a photo of exceptional quality with an interesting subject. -- Horst-schlaemma (talk) 17:06, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support :-) --Oceancetaceen (talk) 12:47, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support Memorino (talk) 16:43, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Mbdortmund (talk) 19:49, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Maybe a clear QI (though the image is not vary sharp) but not enough magic to be a FP. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:39, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose As Alvesgaspar. --Karel (talk) 18:15, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Hard even for QI, bad crop, framing. --Mile (talk) 06:58, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support Ireas talk•de•en 14:40, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Having thought about it per Alvesgaspar I'm afraid --Herby talk thyme 14:42, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- 95.91.67.22 A great picture of the modern Ruhr. -- 95.91.67.22 16:11, 30 March 2010 (UTC) lost my coockie -- Memmingen (talk) 16:13, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support I would remove some sky on the very top but that doesnt justify opposing. What I like: gives good impression on proportions through people and car, colours. --Senfsaat (talk) 16:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support ~Lukas talk 16:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Mrilabs (talk) 17:10, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support nice picture of a remarkably subject --Philipp Wetzlar (talk) 17:36, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry. The picture is good, but this one is better, because there is the better crop to assist the height of the building and would get my vote, if you nominate that instead of this. -- Ra'ike T C 17:42, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support Nice pic! --Timk70 (talk) 17:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- support, although also I'd prefer the cropped version which Ra'ike mentions. But also this given image is featureable. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:06, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support Looks really good! XenonX3 (talk) 18:07, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture