Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 7965-9.jpg

File:Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 7965-9.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2016 at 06:05:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 7965-9.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 7965-9.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Germany
•  Info all by XRay -- XRay ^talk 06:05, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay ^talk 06:05, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support This is just for my hour --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 14:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Great atmosphere. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support You have edited the image with Lighroom, you have a setting for highlights and one for local highlights. You should increase the local highlights at +30, this improves the picture without overexposition. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 15:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks for your hint. I've to define the area to be highlighted if it's a local adjustment. What do you should be improved? The sky? The sun? I'll try to check the improvement. --XRay ^talk 17:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

@XRay: Sorry for my wrong and bad english langage, I didn't want to say "local", I mean tone curve highlights for the whole photo, +30 from current setting. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, Christian. Yes, it's better. I've just uploaded the improved image. --XRay ^talk 19:06, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

@XRay: ok thank you, now it will be perfect if you could decrease just a bit the saturation because images always look more satured after such a change, look at the trees on the right of the image... Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

I'll look for saturation tomorrow. Thanks. --XRay ^talk 19:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes. Thanks. A little less saturation. --XRay ^talk 15:10, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

•  Support - Fantastic, and to me the better of these two photos, especially in terms of composition and contrast of light and shade. Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:44, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 19:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 01:28, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:37, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 11:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:00, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Code (talk) 19:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:10, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support with a suggestion Mood cannot be beat ... it's a lazy summer afternoon you just want to walk right into. But ... I would make a slight crop on the right and get rid of those wooden supports entirely. Daniel Case (talk) 18:03, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. I see the problem and I'll fix it within the next days. --XRay ^talk 18:20, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:54, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:20, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Germany