Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Harvestman opilio canestrinii male.jpg

File:Harvestman opilio canestrinii male.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2015 at 14:15:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Harvestman opilio canestrinii male.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Harvestman opilio canestrinii male.jpg

•  Info This is a male harvestman (Opilio canestrinii) - (not a spider!) - on a geranium flower. He is cleaning his leg by drawing it through his jaws. Photograph taken on Cumnor Hill, Oxford. I think the image has great educational value as it shows a rarely-captured, but typical behaviour. The image is Wikimedia QI and has been the main image on the article Opilio canestrinii since September 2013. created by Charlesjsharp - uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by User:Charlesjsharp
•  Support Rare image with nice composition -- Charles (talk) 14:15, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Really great composition! But the resolution and the picture quality probably isn't worth to be FP. The creature's legs very lacks details/focusing when you zoom in. -- Pofka (talk) 14:48, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Very good work IMHO. Level of detail sufficient for me. Only issue to mention is a red channel overexposure on the flower. --Kreuzschnabel 15:30, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Done thanks - I've adjusted red channel and reduced noise at the same time. --Charles (talk) 16:48, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl (talk) 21:14, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral Unfortunately, there are lack of details of cephalothorax and abdomen in this view. D kuba (talk) 21:21, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Wow. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:42, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:48, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Lauro Sirgado^contribs 16:23, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --· Favalli ⟡ 02:24, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not educational bacause large parts of the legs are "blurred" --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 17:16, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Pofka. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:02, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I really can't understand the above like-type supports. Please note that much of the creature is out of focus and we can hardly see any details in its body and legs. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:16, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Relatively small and relatively little in focus, per others. — Julian H.^✈ 15:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /KTC (talk) 00:17, 20 March 2015 (UTC)