Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Josephskirche Rheinfelden.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Josephskirche Rheinfelden.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2012 at 11:54:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info all by Wladyslaw, Picturesque view at this church (build 1915, historicist architecture) in winter time. In the city of Rheinfelden it's very seldom to have plenty of snow staying for a longer time. But on this day the city got nearly 40 centimeters of snow which was called a century snowfall. So I guess it will be difficult to get such a atmosphere with many snow soon a second time. -- Wladyslaw (talk) 11:54, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 11:54, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support Perfect light and mood. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 19:00, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 19:53, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- Question May I suggest a crop out of the disturbing (to me) road sign at right ?--Jebulon (talk) 20:57, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- Croping it out would mean disturbing the harmony of the length and width of the image, but I'll try to retouch the sign out. --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:26, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support OK, I understand what you mean. In my opinion, the length/width ratio will not be really spoiled by a crop, but it is your aesthetical choice, so I have to respect it. Let's see the retouch, but no need to wait for my support. Stunning picture anyway, per Norbert Nagel.--Jebulon (talk) 09:33, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
- the picture has no street sign any more --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:06, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, better now, I think.--Jebulon (talk) 23:25, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
- the picture has no street sign any more --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:06, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support OK, I understand what you mean. In my opinion, the length/width ratio will not be really spoiled by a crop, but it is your aesthetical choice, so I have to respect it. Let's see the retouch, but no need to wait for my support. Stunning picture anyway, per Norbert Nagel.--Jebulon (talk) 09:33, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
- Croping it out would mean disturbing the harmony of the length and width of the image, but I'll try to retouch the sign out. --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:26, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- MJJR (talk) 21:21, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 05:33, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support--Kürbis (✔) 11:03, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:07, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support ■ MMXX talk 19:54, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 02:50, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support PER ABOVE.Alborzagros (talk) 05:02, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support very nice, everything is very good (light, mood, expouse, sharpness).--ArildV (talk) 14:19, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:46, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support • Richard • [®] • 22:07, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Avenue (talk) 23:32, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Sky looks posterized. B.p. 09:27, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- As you seem to be the only one to see a posterized sky you can mark the parts that should be so? Maybe you can explain to us why the background of this picture File:Common Jezebel Delias eucharis by kadavoor 3.jpg ist better than this one. I'm very curious if we actually get an answer and if this is comprehensible. --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:34, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Sky looks posterized (sic). B.p. 16:44, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- You are not able or not willing to answer my question. QED and EOD --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:58, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- May I advise you not to assume what I can do? It is not healthy. Better fix this image: the FPC guidelines hint that the image has to have adequate quality... B.p. 22:57, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- Instead to bully you could answer my determined question. The image has adequate quality, was elected for QI. You are not giving an answerer despite of my request. So I had to assume that everything is okay with the picture. No need to go round in circles any more. --Wladyslaw (talk) 04:51, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- May I advise you not to assume what I can do? It is not healthy. Better fix this image: the FPC guidelines hint that the image has to have adequate quality... B.p. 22:57, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- You are not able or not willing to answer my question. QED and EOD --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:58, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- Sky looks posterized (sic). B.p. 16:44, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- As you seem to be the only one to see a posterized sky you can mark the parts that should be so? Maybe you can explain to us why the background of this picture File:Common Jezebel Delias eucharis by kadavoor 3.jpg ist better than this one. I'm very curious if we actually get an answer and if this is comprehensible. --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:34, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:42, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Katrouchka90 (talk) 16:41, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:50, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 12:48, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture