Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Knock Out IMG 3830.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2014 at 16:23:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, nominated and uploaded by Hubertl -- Hubertl (talk) 16:23, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Hubertl (talk) 16:23, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Oppose No wow and technical issues like lighting. --Graphium 16:35, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
- What technical issues "like lighting" do you mean exactly? Sounds interesting! --Hubertl (talk) 17:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
- Either the lighting conditions were too dim, or the photo is underexposed. Either way, it doesn't make the photo look good. Sorry. --Graphium 18:28, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
- What technical issues "like lighting" do you mean exactly? Sounds interesting! --Hubertl (talk) 17:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
- Support --LivioAndronico talk 16:58, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
- Support Kruusamägi (talk) 17:33, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Underexposed and DoF too shallow. Daniel Case (talk) 18:24, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
- With all due respect, but there are no underexposed areas at all. Even not in the original RAW file. You can prove it, there is no noise, so I did´nt used any noise reduction. I had to lower the luminance a little bit down, because of the extreme red. Have you opened it on a calibrated monitor or just with your notebook? DOF can be a problem with an object, larger than five centimeter. Even with f/9.0, the end of the really sharp area from this lens. --Hubertl (talk) 20:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
- I refer you to Graphium's response above. I can barely see it. I understand you had to take the luminance down. But did you do it to the whole image, or just the flower? Daniel Case (talk) 05:56, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- With all due respect, but there are no underexposed areas at all. Even not in the original RAW file. You can prove it, there is no noise, so I did´nt used any noise reduction. I had to lower the luminance a little bit down, because of the extreme red. Have you opened it on a calibrated monitor or just with your notebook? DOF can be a problem with an object, larger than five centimeter. Even with f/9.0, the end of the really sharp area from this lens. --Hubertl (talk) 20:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination--Hubertl (talk) 08:34, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- InfoI changed it now to the completely unprocessed version.
