Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leptoglossus occidentalis MHNT.jpg

File:Leptoglossus occidentalis MHNT.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2019 at 06:29:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Leptoglossus occidentalis MHNT.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leptoglossus occidentalis MHNT.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods
•  Info created and uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus - nominated by Boothsift -- BoothSift 06:29, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- BoothSift 06:29, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Remarkably clear, considering that per w:Western conifer seed bug, "the average length is 16-20 millimeters". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:01, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support The bug did what she wanted, I was very happy that she let me take three pictures before flying off. I have not seen this species in my garden since. Thanks to Boothsift for this nomination. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:58, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose A good QI/VI. Unfortunately, the focus is not on the head, there are many reflections from the flash and the leaf is overexposed. I'm guessing, but it looks as is the bug is on a leaf that has been turned upside down. Archaeodontosaurus can correct me. Charles (talk) 08:57, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support good depth of field! Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 09:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 13:17, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I agree with Charles but I feel the slightly out-of-focus head is less important given the resolution, it's sharp at lower but still high resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 16:05, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 17:30, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Hundreds of white dots is the result of excessive use of the flash --Wilfredor (talk) 00:02, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

@Wilfredor: Hundreds of white dots is the result of biology. The species has white dots, take a closer look at other images of the species--BoothSift 02:01, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

@Wilfredor: is right BoothSift Charles (talk) 08:04, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

The white flash points are the product of the overexposure of the flash, here a correctly exposed photo where the surface is observed without white flash points of reflection --Wilfredor (talk) 20:32, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

@Wilfredor: Ah, you meant those dots. I mistook you, my bad--BoothSift 21:31, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

User:Boothsift Sorry it could be maybe because english is not my mother language --Wilfredor (talk) 21:33, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Not a pretty guy, but a pretty shot :) --Poco² 17:06, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not FP level, per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 05:40, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination Will find a better image/version, not to offend you, Archaeodontosaurus, I think this image is very good.--BoothSift 05:58, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 14:38, 22 April 2019 (UTC)