Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Life around jungle.jpg

File:Life around jungle.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2017 at 11:11:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Life around jungle.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Life around jungle.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info created by Pallab kabir, uploaded by Pallabkabir, nominated by Masum-al-Hasan -- Masum-al-Hasan (talk) 11:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Masum-al-Hasan (talk) 11:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Great mood, high quality. --Yann (talk) 14:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good composition, but the image is really unsharp --Shishir 15:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Even on 24 MPx (author left full size) is sharp enough. But composition, color gradience make this shot very original. --Mile (talk) 16:23, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 16:57, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm with Shishir on this one.--Peulle (talk) 17:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral The mood in this is really something but the quality is a bit low. There is also the eternal question if we should feature pictures with people being on railway tracks. I may be swayed either way later. --cart-Talk 18:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose Made up my mind, the quality is simply too low. Pity. --cart-Talk 08:26, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose Great concept. Poor execution. Charles (talk) 19:14, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:54, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support great composition and mood IMO. - Benh (talk) 21:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

• could be further improved by cropping out the bottom maybe... - Benh (talk) 21:12, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Strong oppose on not only the technical issues but the person walking the tracks (unless they are unused, which I doubt from their appearance, but then again they are in a protected area, so maybe ...). Daniel Case (talk) 23:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp. A pity.@cart-Talk:"There is also the eternal question if we should feature pictures with people being on railway tracks" Really ? there is a question about that ? I've never met it...--Jebulon (talk) 15:03, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

• @Jebulon: That qestion is usually brought up at all discussions about photos taken on or in close proximety to railways. Don't you remember this, this or even this as examples? There is even a special template developed for these kind of photos, see {{Tracks are for trains}}, it is used on 2609 photos. --cart-Talk 15:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

• @W.carter: ...Completely new for me. Typically anglo-saxon, with all due respect. Does it exist for highways, roads, sea, rivers, and all dangerous places (McDonalds restaurants, my bed, or so) ?--Jebulon (talk) 15:50, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

• @Jebulon: , well not entirely Anglo-Saxon... but that is in Canada. --cart-Talk 17:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

• Yes, anglo-saxon indeed. French speaking Canadians are americans...speaking french. And not latin-Europeans.--Jebulon (talk) 23:11, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

• And what do quebecois people do when you call them "Anglo-Saxon" to their faces? Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:45, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

• Cross the Atlantic Ocean first, and think about during that time.--Jebulon (talk) 09:20, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Support wow surpasses lacks of quality IMO Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 16:58, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Strong support For Christian --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:49, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Shishir--great idea but unsharp. The tracks look curvy, if true, trains aren't using them. If optical illusion, I don't care if people are on it if it was done safely. Three animals are on it and aren't scared: a monkey, a large bird, and what looks like some sort of ungulate. There's something odd about the backlight on the monkey. PumpkinSky talk 22:22, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Sorry, but opposing because "people walking on a railway track" is really a stupid reason. As before. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:33, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • +1. And we are to promote this as QI ?--Jebulon (talk) 16:16, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 18:46, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
•  weak oppose it really is a lovely scene/picture, but the technical issues are a bit too much. That said, there may be some opportunities for improvement. Cropping out some of the foreground, pulling some of the details out of the darkness, etc. Not sure it would bring it to FP. You should certainly be proud of this shot, though. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  01:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:35, 29 September 2017 (UTC)