Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lysets tøven.jpg

File:Lysets tøven.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2017 at 18:46:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lysets tøven.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lysets tøven.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Denmark
•  Info all by me Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 18:46, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 18:46, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - Really nice picture. Does the bridge in fact curve? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Yes the brigde does curve, see this picture: File:Århus ringgadebro.JPG. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 05:41, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:27, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment I also really like the image, but where is the purple light coming from? WClarke 03:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Read this signeklejss.wordpress.com, it tells about it. "Hundreds of lamps will compete with the sunset, and by twilight the bridge will be lit up in its full form. Each unique night sky will define the bridge’s color. Two cameras positioned on the tower of Godsbanen will point to every corner of the sky and record the colors in a given period of time while the sun goes down. The information about the sky’s colors is then converted into the bridge’s new palette. Clothed in nature’s colors – large and lit – the bridge will enter a new visual dialogue with the landscape and the surrounding city architecture." --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 05:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Question Which camera and lens did you use? The focal length given in the EXIF data is impressive. --Code (talk) 06:52, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Canon 5D mrk III, lens 24-70 mm ultrasonic at 33 mm, it is a "exposure fusion" og 3 pictures 0,5 - 2,0 -8,0 sec at f / 8.0 .--Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:11, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks. --Code (talk) 10:43, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

•  Support very nice composition Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:52, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice, and thanks for the details. --Yann (talk) 08:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Code (talk) 10:43, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Much better that the first nom. Thanks for taking this photo instead. :) --cart-Talk 12:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 14:24, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 19:20, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support WClarke 04:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:44, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Qualified support in that as excellent as this picture is, I hope you were taking it from somewhere accessible to the public (the geocoding says it was taken from the bridge ... or are we to take it that it's of the bridge?). I really do not want to encourage unsafe behavior around trains, such as trespassing into actively-used track areas, in the name of great pictures. Daniel Case (talk) 20:13, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment It was taken of the brigde, I will correct it. I was standing on safe place with no trains running, I iven talk with the the people working there. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 20:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
    • @Villy Fink Isaksen: OK, good. As long as the employees knew you were there. They probably shouldn't be letting people do that, but that's between them and the railroad, not us. Daniel Case (talk) 17:28, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I really like this one; the pink bridge looks really strange -- Thennicke (talk) 02:28, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 18:12, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Wow! --Michielverbeek (talk) 11:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:53, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:06, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places#Denmark