Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:MANNapoli 9112 Sacrifice Iphigenia painting.jpg

File:MANNapoli 9112 Sacrifice Iphigenia painting.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2016 at 15:21:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:MANNapoli 9112 Sacrifice Iphigenia painting.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:MANNapoli 9112 Sacrifice Iphigenia painting.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info created by an unknown ancient roman painter - the rest by me -- Jebulon (talk) 15:21, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Antique illustration of a famous myth: the Sacrifice of Iphigenia. Iphigenia is carried to the sacrifice (centre) while the seer Calchas (on the right) watches on and Agamemnon (on the left) covers his head in sign of deploration (enjoy the painted drapé). In the sky, Artemis appears with a hind which will be substituted to the young girl. Fresco from the "House of the Tragic Poet" in Pompeii, 1st century of the current era, now on display in the National Archaeological Museum of Naples, Italy.-- Jebulon (talk) 15:21, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 16:34, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral Chromatic aberration, distortion, light blue in right side, color balance, underexposed... --The Photographer (talk) 17:50, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
  • I'd be happy for notes, please. I don't think there is anything real in these criticisms, which are good reasons for an "oppose", and not for a "neutral" vote...--Jebulon (talk) 20:23, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

I love this picture, pictures of paintings is one of my favorite subjects. I believe that all these problems are correctable and is the reason why I voted neutral. :) --The Photographer (talk) 00:58, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Neutral per The Photographer, as I would like to know how this compares to other digitizations. Daniel Case (talk) 19:42, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
  • My advice: simply judge what you see !--Jebulon (talk) 20:23, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

+1 to the Photographer's response. Daniel Case (talk) 20:18, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Sorry to disagree. There is no CA, no distortion(nor the painting neither the frame are straight), the color balance is right, and it is not underexposed. Yes, the lateral light is not optimal, but the slight blue in right side seems acceptable to me comment by @Jebulon: who forgot sing sign --The Photographer (talk) 04:10, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

@The Photographer: I never forget to "sing", especially when listening choral music by Bach or Haendel, two of my best friends !🎼🎧🎤🎵🎶--Jebulon (talk) 00:17, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

lol, I'm sorry. --The Photographer (talk) 16:10, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:34, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 12:41, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:34, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:17, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:42, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:13, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects