Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:March on washington Aug 28 1963.jpg

File:March on washington Aug 28 1963.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2019 at 01:25:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:March on washington Aug 28 1963.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:March on washington Aug 28 1963.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1960-1970
•  Info created by United States Information Agency - uploaded by Esemono - nominated by Fluffy89502 -- Fluffy89502 ~ talk^ 01:25, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Fluffy89502 ~ talk^ 01:25, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:37, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support. Impressive historic photo. --Cayambe (talk) 07:32, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Great historic photo Taewangkorea (talk) 08:19, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:34, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I agree. Great historical significance.--Peulle (talk) 09:01, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good photo of an historically important event. Cmao20 (talk) 14:21, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Neutral Actually, I agree with Charles' point. Cmao20 (talk) 14:47, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose But it's not a great photo with feet and hand cut off. Charles (talk) 14:30, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Charles--Boothsift 17:58, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support As been said just recently, this is not a classical portrait or still life photo. Perfectly fine as is, would even posit it works better because the cut parts add tension where there would be very little otherwise. -- KennyOMG (talk) 18:06, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose muuch agree Charles Seven Pandas (talk) 20:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose The composition of the image is not really good even thought that the image has a great historical value! --Chmee2 (talk) 07:49, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulphere 12:46, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose The composition is not perfect. --Gnosis (talk) 10:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - I can't believe you folks who demand "perfect" compositions of historical events. Just amazing. From the file description: "In the Winter 2004, Vol. 36, No. 4 of the National Archives magazine, Prologue, named this image one of its top ten requested images[1]" -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:44, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment that is exactly what I have been asking myself this entire time. -- Fluffy89502 ~ talk^ 22:44, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Charles. -- Karelj (talk) 18:13, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:10, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Yes, historical value, but composition is far from the best we have. This one is better, although the quality is much lower. Hopefully a high resolution scan could be made. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:35, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Eatcha (talk) 21:43, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:13, 11 July 2019 (UTC)