Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Matterhorn, March 2019 (01).jpg

File:Matterhorn, March 2019 (01).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Feb 2021 at 18:37:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Matterhorn, March 2019 (01).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Matterhorn, March 2019 (01).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Valais
•  Info Surprisingly we don't actually seem to have many FPs of the Matterhorn - I can only see two. This is good and should IMO still be FP but it's very old and not high resolution, and this is beautiful but very different from the photo I present here. created by Liridon - uploaded by Liridon - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support--Ermell (talk) 07:42, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --StellarHalo (talk) 13:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Seven Pandas (talk) 14:47, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Commonists 16:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

• Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 15:12, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support IamMM (talk) 06:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Matt light. Not outstanding enough for this prominent motif. --Milseburg (talk) 12:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support I've been there few times. The mountain could have been photographed much more impressively. But he also continues to fascinate me.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Could be crisper (IMHO f/13 was not the best choice on a APS/DX camera), but overall good. --Aristeas (talk) 08:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Weak support The Matterhorn is an impressive, distinctive enough mountain that it can withstand the soft light. However, I do find the large cloud right over it a little distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 16:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Milseburg, too much sky. —kallerna (talk) 13:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Switzerland#Valais