Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Michelangelo's Pietà Saint Peter's Basilica Vatican City.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Michelangelo's Pietà Saint Peter's Basilica Vatican City.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2013 at 18:21:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Michelangelo's Pietà
  •  Info created by Michelangelo - Photographied, uploaded and nominated by me -- Jebulon (talk) 18:21, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support This new version of the Michelangelo's Pietà, one of the marvels on the human genius IMO. I know that we already have a Featured Picture of the same subject, but it is now a bit old (2008), and a bit small. The nominated version has double size. It seems to have a sufficient quality (better than the already feaured version IMO). Those who know the place know also how it is difficult to take such a photograph, without tripod nor flash, and through a glass...-- Jebulon (talk) 18:21, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment --The contrast of the edited version is better but why did you clone out the lights' reflects? These are natural on this highly polished marble and contribute to the sensation of volume, partially lost in this edited one. Sting (talk) 20:52, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Perspectives to remove : drawing marble at right and the marble at left are leaning out a little bit. And also CAs (see notes) Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • CAs on horizontal lines? No, and I doubt it's focus fringing. May be the color cast of a different color-balanced light, probably a window visible in the reflect of Christ's left leg. See for example the blue patch at the extreme lower-right corner, as well as in several shadows. Sting (talk) 21:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • En effet, merci Sting. On voit d'ailleurs un peu de reflet bleu dans le coin inférieur droit. Pour la perspective, je ne vois pas l'erreur, ça me parait bon, compte tenu de ce que je ne suis pas pile en face de l'œuvre, il y a forcément un effet de profondeur. Pour les reflets, je peux essayer d'utiliser les deux images par empilement des couches. Profiter à la fois des bons reflets et du meilleur contraste. Ça vous irait ?--Jebulon (talk) 21:50, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • Si tu as pris la photo en Raw et si tu l'acceptes, envoie-moi ce fichier et j'essayerai de l'améliorer avec DxO. Mais à mon avis la majorité de ces reflets sont brûlés ce qui personnellement ne me pose aucun problème dans le cas de cette photo parce que c'est naturel et n'est pas un défaut technique. L'autre FP est d'ailleurs pareil. Une erreur àma serait de les supprimer ou pire de les rendre gris. Sting (talk) 22:49, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  OpposeLook like a straight snap shot to me, Don't find much "wow" --Dey.sandip (talk) 07:48, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Until perspectives corrected. Sorry to insist but IMO the verticals of the little wall at left must to be straight. Me I see and I find it's a bit disturbing Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:05, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • When looking at the picture at full size and presuming the background wall has been well constructed, you will in fact notice the photograph is (very) slightly CW rotated (but the lines are parallel). So it is the lower-left structure which is in reality and on location as well as the only one in the picture leaning leftwards. See notes I added. Sting (talk) 13:50, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination visiblement, le peuple n'est pas prêt... Restons donc à l'ancienne version.--Jebulon (talk) 13:01, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Michelangelo%27s_Pietà_Saint_Peter%27s_Basilica_Vatican_City.jpg&oldid=115116819"