Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moxon A Map of the Earth 1681 Cornell CUL PJM 1012 01.jpg

File:Moxon A Map of the Earth 1681 Cornell CUL PJM 1012 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2016 at 15:06:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Moxon A Map of the Earth 1681 Cornell CUL PJM 1012 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moxon A Map of the Earth 1681 Cornell CUL PJM 1012 01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps
•  Info Joseph Moxon, A Map of the Earth, 1681. (cm, H x W) 32 x 46. View of the world as known in 1681. The seven days of creation are illustrated in the panels at the top of the map.- uploaded by EVDiam - nominated by EVDiam -- EVDiam (talk) 15:06, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- EVDiam (talk) 15:06, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Interesting document, good reproduction. --Yann (talk) 16:22, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support good work! Only Portugall with a double-l disturbs me a little --Hubertl 16:36, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Lovely map in good condition. I don't recommend spending much time looking at it in full size, because that's clearly larger than life size and not how the illustrations are meant to be seen. 1280/1020 is a good size to look at. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:14, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:11, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:13, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Nice map but... the names of some countries are out of step with the date of the Map... Mexico was not Mexico in those days... nor Italy, to name a few... or am I wrong? --Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:47, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment good point, I also stumbled upon these terms. Well, one could argue that they sometimes seem to refer to socio-geographical rather than political entities in the narrow sense --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:39, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment The nation-states did not come to be until the 1800s. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:29, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment of course they didn't. The terms, however, are much older (cf. Latin Italia, Germania) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:38, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:59, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 17:29, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 22:05, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:20, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:08, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Maps