Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Municipal Market of São Paulo city.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Municipal Market of São Paulo city.jpg, featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2016 at 16:26:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info All by -- The Photographer (talk) 16:26, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Support Wilfredo's style. Nice colors and textures too. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)- Support - That's an absolute riot of colors and shapes. I like it because it gives my eyes a lot to move around, but I think some people will see that as a negative ("too much going on") and vote against it for that reason. We shall see. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support INeverCry 18:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Neutral I like the image, but consider it somewhat small. Kruusamägi (talk) 19:03, 2 July 2016 (UTC){neutral}Per Kruusamägi. Looks downsampled because unsharp at full size. But very colorful and nice subject.--Jebulon (talk) 20:03, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- I have been critic too of this bad practice and it's not downsampled and you will find the RAW file in the description. My camera has 10 years old thanks to a WMF global locked user, however, if I was the owner of a D800 I never would downsampled an image. A good camera and good lenses create an image with great detail, in my case, I always try to squeeze the most of what my camera and lenses can give. I always upload RAW images after an image is FP, however, bothers me such distrust, especially when I have been the main downsize critic --The Photographer (talk) 20:24, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- I wrote "looks". Of course I trust you, sorry if I hurt.--Jebulon (talk) 23:04, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- I have been critic too of this bad practice and it's not downsampled and you will find the RAW file in the description. My camera has 10 years old thanks to a WMF global locked user, however, if I was the owner of a D800 I never would downsampled an image. A good camera and good lenses create an image with great detail, in my case, I always try to squeeze the most of what my camera and lenses can give. I always upload RAW images after an image is FP, however, bothers me such distrust, especially when I have been the main downsize critic --The Photographer (talk) 20:24, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Very colorful and beautiful. Ali Zifan 22:11, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Per Ali. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:01, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Oppose small --Mile (talk) 08:02, 3 July 2016 (UTC)- Oppose too small --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:56, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support per Ali --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:52, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support It has its limitations, but how can we not? Would make a great jigsaw puzzlw. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Albertus teolog (talk) 04:05, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support − Meiræ 08:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support For colors.--Jebulon (talk) 09:37, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Yes, it's a bit on the small side, but it's the kind of juicy pic that makes you want to write an article about fruit markets just to be able to use this as main pic. w.carter-Talk 22:18, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink
