Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nofretete Neues Museum.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Nofretete Neues Museum.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2010 at 03:13:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Xenon 77 - uploaded by Xenon 77 - nominated by Spongie555 -- Spongie555 (talk) 03:13, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Spongie555 (talk) 03:13, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support--Mbz1 (talk) 16:09, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:50, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Noisy... --Citron (talk) 22:15, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Cephas (talk) 10:18, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support cool --Mbdortmund (talk) 22:46, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support very expressive — Habib M'HENNI [¿tell me?] 16:51, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support --IdLoveOne (talk) 18:39, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support whichever is more natural/realistic. --IdLoveOne (talk) 18:45, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Strong support: Beautiful colors! –hoverFly | chat? 17:09, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support noisy but very beautiful Cathy Richards (talk) 18:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
NeutralThe object (work of art, if it was a work of art) is beautiful. The subject (The Queen) is beautiful too, according to our modern culture standards (not sure for the post-Akhenaton egyptians !). No doubt for me. But I'm not convinced by the photograph, even it semms to be the best we have. It is noisy, and I dislike the (maroon) post-processing very disturbing IMO on the chin, the neck, and on the shadow of the chin. The highlights over the eye and the shoulder should be a bit corrected to, IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 10:04, 29 September 2010 (UTC)- Support JukoFF (talk) 19:44, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:03, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose, though I suppose I'm too late to make any difference here. Surely one of the characteristics of an image that is among "the finest on Commons" must be that it is not capable of being significantly improved upon. I don't think that's the case with this photo: there are reflections from the glass case in the lower neck area and ugly blown highlights on the shoulder, nose and forehead. In addition it's noisy in the shadows, and the colour balance is way off. I've uploaded a cleaned up version (aside), but since this is an easily rephotographable object I'd really prefer to see a better quality, higher resolution photo featured. Smalljim (talk) 16:46, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Change "neutral" to Oppose, agree with Smalljim--Jebulon (talk) 14:13, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Smalljim. Lycaon (talk) 22:27, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:46, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects
The chosen alternative is: File:Nofretete Neues Museum.jpg