Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nutmeg ready.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Nutmeg ready.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2016 at 07:15:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
Info 
Featured picture on Arabic Wikipedia.created by Cptguy - uploaded by Cptguy - nominated by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Support -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Oppose - It's a Quality Image, but I don't find anything impressive about it. There's nothing great to me about the composition, and only half of the nutmeg is in focus. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 5 January 2016 (UTC)- Oppose Per Ikan. INeverCry 07:54, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Too noisy, not even QI for me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:41, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 11:58, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I think this is a great photo with excellent composition. It's one of the Wiki Loves Africa 2014/Winners. The focus is on the interesting half of the nutmeg. The hands are arranged well and it looks like the nutmeg has just been opened and presented so the image tells a story. But a shame that somehow the JPG has been damaged by processing. The file is AdobeRGB colourspace, which isn't ideal but I wonder if someone has tried adjusting the colours using a really naive application. Because the whole image is covered in what looks like a dithering pattern -- not noise at all. Like the whole image has been reduced to 256 colours or something. The colour temperature looks a little yellow too. I hope the original JPG exists so it can be fixed. -- Colin (talk) 14:57, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ikan. ~ Moheen (talk) 17:17, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Colin and everyone else. Daniel Case (talk) 17:33, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:50, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
