Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paragliding high above Queenstown.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Paragliding high above Queenstown.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2011 at 16:34:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by me. -- Avenue (talk) 16:34, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Support -- Avenue (talk) 16:34, 1 May 2011 (UTC)- Support Tomer T (talk) 17:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Oppose Nice but the foreground is underexposed and the clouds seem overexposed (they could just be really bright white, I'm not sure). --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:53, 1 May 2011 (UTC)- Support --Snaevar (talk) 07:52, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose I think it is too dark in foreground, especially at left.--Jebulon (talk) 16:27, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose per Jebulon and no wow here for me --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:27, 3 May 2011 (UTC), above all: for illustrating paragliding there is not enough paragliding (too small), for illustrating Queenstown not enough of the town to see, the combination is neither fish nor fowl --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:30, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- I agree it doesn't show much detail about Queenstown or paragliding. My aim was more to convey an aspect of how people experience the grandeur of the landscape there. But I respect your opinion. --Avenue (talk) 15:13, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- Info I've uploaded a new version, with softened highlights and lifted shadows, which might address some of the concerns expressed. --Avenue (talk) 15:13, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support --
aghith 08:10, 6 May 2011 (UTC) - Oppose I think it's just too dark. --Ximonic (talk) 15:29, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support Per Avenue's comment. --Lošmi (talk) 23:28, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose - little educative value. --Спас Колев (talk) 14:24, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
