Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Piz Palü main summit Panorama beschriftet.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Piz Palü main summit Panorama beschriftet.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2017 at 23:06:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Capricorn4049 -- Capricorn4049 (talk) 23:06, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Capricorn4049 (talk) 23:06, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:48, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:36, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:30, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Neutral A lot of work and a great panorama, but there is a completely unsharp section (Piz Mezdi, Piz Mandra) --Llez (talk) 10:47, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Not a good day for an annotated panorama when many identified peaks are obscured. Charles (talk) 11:04, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Pofka (talk) 20:22, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Llez; also, frankly, this is trying to do too much. A VI for sure but I think it is more annotated than necessary to be effective. Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Llez and Daniel. Good and instructiv, but not perfect. There is an very unsharp section between Ringelspitz and Brisi. Further more I see a stitching error right of Lodner. For me labels a bit too dominant. By the way: The 360°-template isn´t working here. --Milseburg (talk) 11:52, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Heavy noise --The Photographer 00:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Karelj (talk) 19:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Probably a very good document, but useless in most parts, per Charles.--Jebulon (talk) 15:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support --B dash (talk) 10:38, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results: