Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SNCF TGV Duplex Cize-Bolozon.jpg

File:SNCF TGV Duplex Cize-Bolozon.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2021 at 05:15:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:SNCF TGV Duplex Cize-Bolozon.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SNCF TGV Duplex Cize-Bolozon.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
•  Info We have FP of the same viaduct from 2011 with summer colors. Created & uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Ivar (talk) 05:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support IMO the presence of the train and its reflection in the water is the main difference between the two images, not the colors. I like this one more.--IamMM (talk) 10:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Question Obviously good, but do we need two vitually identical FPs? The other is better as the left foreground is clear. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice mirror image and composition. The colors of the season make it special and unique, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Prefer the already-FP image. --A.Savin 12:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:37, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support The autumn colours are lovely and this one is sharper too. -- Colin (talk) 13:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support The autumn colours make this much better than the existing FP. --Tagooty (talk) 15:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:32, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support POS78 (talk) 17:28, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Not to take anything away from the existing FP, but ... this one has a bit more going on with the sky and that rocky promontory in front, in addition to the fall color. Daniel Case (talk) 17:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:08, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Ximonic (talk) 21:33, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support per Colin and Daniel. --Aristeas (talk) 07:33, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:00, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 14:06, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Some of the foliage could be sharper, but that's not very important in context and it's quite a beautiful photo. I also think it's completely fine to have two FPs of this viaduct. The compositions are substantially different and the fall colors make the motif appear very different. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support. Meiræ 15:14, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulphere 17:11, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --RolfHill (talk) 18:16, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay 💬 06:35, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Commonists 12:33, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

• Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 21:38, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Support OvaThunder9^💬 22:19, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 16:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles