Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Scallop Diagram2.svg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Scallop Diagram2.svg, featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2015 at 21:09:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by KDS444 - uploaded by KDS444 - nominated by KDS4444 -- KDS4444 (talk) 21:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC) (Note that these accounts both belong to the same user).
Support -- KDS4444 (talk) 21:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)- Support Very well! -- Lauro Sirgadocontribs 13:55, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment Whoa, that takes quite some time to render in Firefox – looks like you put a lot of work into this! One thing I noticed is that the blue dots (eyes?) turn into very small black dots if rendered in Firefox. Also, the W3C validator finds some errors concerning re-used IDs. Apart from that: Very nice work imho, though that sheer mass of text somehow distracts from the graphics. Have you thought about a plain numbered version? That would remove some of the clutter and make the whole thing language-neutral at the same time. --El Grafo (talk) 14:37, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- I considered a numbered version, but ironically, as the numbers increase it becomes increasingly difficult to keep track of which number corresponds to which anatomical part! I could reduce the number of parts mentioned, but the parts mentioned here are a consistent list of those usually covered in the anatomical literature on the animal (while still leaving out many of the more obscure parts, if you can imagine!). As an SVG, it should be translatable into other languages fairly easily (which is supposed to be one of the great things about the SVG format, yes? Though it seems it is seldom enough actually done...). Also, heads-up: image now passes SVG validation! Don't know why I didn't take care of this before now. Lastly, have fixed the issue with the eyes turning out very small and black. Now they should all appear large and blue, as intended. -KDS4444 (talk) 09:44, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I can see your point. The blue circles are still black dots in my Firefox 32.0, but I just noticed that it also somehow manages to render DejaVuSans as a serif font, so that's not unlikely to be my browser's fault. → Support --El Grafo (talk) 12:47, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I can see your point. The blue circles are still black dots in my Firefox 32.0, but I just noticed that it also somehow manages to render DejaVuSans as a serif font, so that's not unlikely to be my browser's fault. →
- I considered a numbered version, but ironically, as the numbers increase it becomes increasingly difficult to keep track of which number corresponds to which anatomical part! I could reduce the number of parts mentioned, but the parts mentioned here are a consistent list of those usually covered in the anatomical literature on the animal (while still leaving out many of the more obscure parts, if you can imagine!). As an SVG, it should be translatable into other languages fairly easily (which is supposed to be one of the great things about the SVG format, yes? Though it seems it is seldom enough actually done...). Also, heads-up: image now passes SVG validation! Don't know why I didn't take care of this before now. Lastly, have fixed the issue with the eyes turning out very small and black. Now they should all appear large and blue, as intended. -KDS4444 (talk) 09:44, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support I personally prefer text over numbers. Kruusamägi (talk) 23:55, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support, now valid SVG (otherwise "wow" per User:El Grafo, i.e., make it language-neutral). –Be..anyone (talk) 04:45, 20 January 2015 (UTC) Updated. –Be..anyone (talk) 11:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Now passes validation! Support vote? Yes? -KDS4444 (talk) 10:24, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support Outstanding contribution. Thanks a lot for this exceptional work. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:22, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Baresi F (talk) 17:15, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated
