Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schedelsche Weltchronik Trier 1497.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Schedelsche Weltchronik Trier 1497.jpg, featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2020 at 11:05:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Printed#Other
Info View of Trier in Schedel's World History (1497), reproduced from an original woodcut of 1497, uploaded and nominated by -- Palauenc05 (talk) 11:05, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 11:05, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Detail is blown-out and irreparably lost in some parts of the image, especially the left edge. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:09, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment In full resolution the surface structure of the paper is clearly visible. --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:19, 11 August 2020 (UTC)- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:38, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Nice drawing for me. It's a black and white drawing so I'm not really sure what detail could be blown out. Cmao20 (talk) 15:39, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- For me, either it should be edited so that the background is pure white, or if there is going to be a natural background showing the texture of the paper, it shouldn't be blown out. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:10, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Very good for me. I don't see any parts blown out. -- Spurzem (talk) 07:25, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:46, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:13, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:59, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Per King of Hearts. The paper structure is quite visible in most parts of the image, but there clearly is a considerable loss of detail due to blown-out highlights (especially at the left edge of the paper). --El Grafo (talk) 08:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Seems excessively manipulated. No-one's looking at images of this era and wishing they look like this. It's, frankly, half way between acceptable states: No paper texture or the original. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:15, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment It has been enhanced and quite a few spots have been removed. No excessive manipulation at all. --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Printed#Other
