Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Birth of Venus (Botticelli) 1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:The Birth of Venus (Botticelli) 1.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2021 at 19:33:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
- Info created by Commonists - uploaded by Commonists - nominated by Commonists -- Commonists 19:33, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Abstain -- Commonists 19:33, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Google Art Project version was already promoted here. MZaplotnik(talk) 19:47, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yes ten years ago,besides they restored it in 2019, the quality is lower in my opinion. Thank you.--Commonists 19:59, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose It looks to me like the "restoration" damaged the painting, which is common - well-meaning people remove too much from paintings, flattening works that are not supposed to look flat. And the older photo is sharper at the same resolution but is higher-resolution. You can make an argument for best in scope for after the latest restoration at VIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:20, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Lovely painting but the Google version is more how this iconic painting is usually imagined to be, and it is sharper and better resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 07:21, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't know what's gone wrong with this photo. It looks like you photographed a cheap reproduction in IKEA. Far from seeing brush strokes and cracks when I pixel peep, I see a pattern that looks too much like some printing artefact or camera noise. It is also quite considerably cropped. -- Colin (talk) 16:01, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:46, 12 October 2021 (UTC)