Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:USA 10187 Horseshoe Bend Luca Galuzzi 2007.jpg

File:USA 10187 Horseshoe Bend Luca Galuzzi 2007.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2010 at 21:46:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:USA 10187 Horseshoe Bend Luca Galuzzi 2007.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:USA 10187 Horseshoe Bend Luca Galuzzi 2007.jpg

•  Info created and uploaded by Lucag - nominated by -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:46, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:46, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Second try. As before, I prefer the present FP -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:04, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Why do they have to be in competition with each other? We have a lot of FPs of the same subject (the moon, and Saturn, for instance), and this one is different from the other (all the shadows and light sources are different, the sky is overcast here). --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:48, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Strong support Wonderful! - LeavXC (talk) 03:33, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Everything looks ok, but the sky! Bu tür seçkin resmilerde resmin genelinde bir mükemmeliyet gerekir. Yine de tebrikler. Mulazimoglu (talk) 09:40, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
  • The sky is overcast, so that's why it's white. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:39, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Is there another word for "mükmemmeliyet"? The translation programs, and Google, have trouble with it. Walter Siegmund (talk) 22:42, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
    • Sorry. It is mükemmeliyet. Means somethşng like being in the state of perfection.Mulazimoglu (talk) 17:45, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
      • That is much better. Thank you. Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:04, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment - Good photo of a great place, but I agree with Alvesgaspar that this one is better. Jonathunder (talk) 19:16, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:26, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I like both versions, but the colors in this one are very rich. --IdLoveOne (talk) 04:42, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support the old version has a better impression of height due to the shadows falling into the valley, the skies are not blown out and the water has this intense green. the impression we have here is very different (due to daytime and season). this image has more dynamic range and the colours are more convincing than in the old fp. again the best solution might be a middle course: green colour of the water, blue skies and dynamic range. perhaps such a picture will be created as well some day. regards, PETER WEIS TALK 10:44, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:04, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Ggia (talk) 13:29, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Strong support Wonderful! And as the Whale said: Contrary to the valued pictures, the featured pictures can contain several pictures with the same subject. --McIntosh Natura (talk) 15:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Support !!! –hoverFly | chat? 17:17, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Would prefer a version not taken when overcast, but overall a good photo. --nsaum75^¡שיחת! 18:30, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Alvesgaspar--Jebulon (talk) 00:15, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice, great color. Stellarkid (talk) 04:19, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose poor DOF and resolution, don't like the colors, nothing changed, this one too similar and much better (per Alvesgaspar) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:07, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Lošmi (talk) 00:27, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:20, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural