Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Versteende berkendoder (Piptoporus betulinus). 09-08-2020 (d.j.b.) 03.jpg

File:Versteende berkendoder (Piptoporus betulinus). 09-08-2020 (d.j.b.) 03.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2020 at 04:37:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Versteende berkendoder (Piptoporus betulinus). 09-08-2020 (d.j.b.) 03.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Versteende berkendoder (Piptoporus betulinus). 09-08-2020 (d.j.b.) 03.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Fomitopsidaceae
•  Info Bottom of one fossilized Piptoporus betulinus on a dead birch in disrepair. Focus stack of 9 photos. It almost looks like a monster. But it's a dead mushroom on a dead birch. Important in the cycle biotope of nature.
  All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Peulle (talk) 06:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Question Is the colour of the background from nature? Several areas are over-exposed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

• Answer: The dead birch is surrounded by other trees. The background would therefore be very disturbing. This background is not disturbing to me. The color of the top of this petrified mushroom has more or less disappeared and is overly white! Dead birch also has little color. Death in this case is not very colorful.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose artificial background Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment doesn't look like natural to me and reminds background of this photo. --Ivar (talk) 12:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Cmao20 (talk) 15:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose This artificial background doesn't look appealing to me. --Ivar (talk) 15:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose because of the unnatural background color --Uoaei1 (talk) 04:54, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles --StellarHalo (talk) 08:13, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Could work with a more reasonable color choice, but as it is, the cold blue background color just makes no sense to me – especially given the warm light on the subject. This kind of teal color just does not occur naturally, at least not on objects that are large enough to serve as a background here. If I saw this in reality I would assume that either there was a big man-made object behind the tree (maybe one of these) or I had stumbled into some kind of pop-art exhibition. --El Grafo (talk) 13:06, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per El Grafo. Daniel Case (talk) 16:38, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)