Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:折鶴.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:折鶴.jpg, not featured
[edit]- Info created by Laitche - uploaded by Laitche - nominated by Richard Bartz --Richard Bartz 21:21, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Info Origami cranes
- Support very nice --Richard Bartz 21:21, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support Thanks. -- Laitche 05:43, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- MJJR 21:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Background color. Slight posterization. Low resolution for a studio shot. Only an average level of "wow". -- Ram-Man 21:38, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- This is not a studio shot, this is a outdoor shot. It's a sunlight. This one was taken in sunset. :) -- Laitche 05:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- I like this background colour because this picture was taken in sunset outdoors and this colour makes me feel sunset. -- Laitche 08:43, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose As Ram-Man. The quality of image and also nothig with high wow factor for me. And as I remember well, this image or some very similar was on this page some time ago. --Karelj 22:54, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- I renominated the original version.(actually fixed some flaws.) -- Laitche 05:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Don't like the light or that surface they're resting on. --Dori - Talk 02:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 15:22, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Origami cranes.jpg, not featured
[edit]- Info More high resolution (original resolution) version. --Laitche 05:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche 05:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Richard Bartz 11:00, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Don't like the light or that surface they're resting on. --Dori - Talk 02:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose I really appreciate the higher resolution (I applaud all users who do that!), but I can't turn a blind eye to the other issues that I still find inherent in this image. Sorry. -- Ram-Man 00:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Plain. If the objects were bigger, it would be better. --Applebee 10:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 15:22, 22 February 2008 (UTC)