Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:2014-09-29 - Reichsbrücke-Donau City-Sunken City.jpg

Image:2014-09-29 - Reichsbrücke-Donau City-Sunken City.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2014 at 19:20:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/Image:2014-09-29 - Reichsbrücke-Donau City-Sunken City.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:2014-09-29 - Reichsbrücke-Donau City-Sunken City.jpg

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Hubertl (talk) 19:20, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Hubertl (talk) 19:20, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Great work, and thank you for not excessively downsamling the end result;-) -- Slaunger (talk) 19:35, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Lamp posts and the DC tower are leaning in. --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:30, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

  Done!--Hubertl (talk) 21:44, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

   Support Ok now! --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:31, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Another one of those images in which the 21st century looks exactly the way it was imagined on the covers of 20th-century science-fiction paperbacks. I shall have to see this myself at some point. Daniel Case (talk) 02:11, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:39, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Colin (talk) 22:12, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Florian Fuchs (talk) 09:31, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Halavar (talk) 16:01, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
• For sure an interessting view at a interessting skyline. UNO-City in Vienna is always a grateful photographic item. But we have a technical insufficiency in sharpness (not even the bridge is really sharp). --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:35, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Completely sharp at 4000px, so good enough for me. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:10, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:10, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --P e z i (talk) 10:22, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose

• What's the subject of this image?
  • The 2 left lines leads our eyes to the lighthouse.
  • In the right we have a strange metal bring more distraction. And lines going to nowhere creating more distraction, and leading our eyes again away from the main subject.
  • Why this huge empty space at the left? And a lot of no important things at the bottom, even the reflection is not great, water is moving, not clear reflection...
• Is not sharp, as Wladyslaw said, not even the bridge is sharp, let alone the buildings...
• We have a lost of information in the main building, so overexposure that we have a pure white in practically 25% of the edification...
• For me a crop could be better as this: File:2014-09-29 - Reichsbrücke-DC-SunkenCity-Editar.jpg.
• And if you had wait a little more to took this picture you would had this light: File:DC Tower 1 September 2013.png or better.
• So, sorry, but no. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 22:14, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

• Why so emotional? Have you ever been in this part of Vienna? This one is a "before"-picture. But thank you, I can accept your opinion and I´am sorry, that I cannot meet your expectations with this very personal idea. --Hubertl (talk) 22:44, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
• I left a note on this picture, where you can realize, how it was before and my position two weeks ago. --Hubertl (talk) 22:58, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

• Hi, Hubertl, I'm not here to offend you, or throw your work away.
• I'm just attacking the technical points to improve your photos, not saying anything about the historical importance of that.
• If the lighthouse is important put it in focus, if the tower is the main thing, toward the lines to the build, move around to find this lines, to eliminate distractions. If the grass is important, lay down, put it in the first layer, and the skyline in the background (something like: File:Field of sunflowers (4883070812).jpg, this is not a great pic, but the idea is there).
• You can try a long exposure with a 1.8 (or more) ND filter, to have a more soft water, and not overexposure spots, or try in a more cloudy day or in the gold hour.
• See the cropped image, and the other image that a linked, if you lives close, or there, you could go there, do a better shot, and bring us again.
• This is just tips to sole problems that I bring, but it's up to you. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 23:21, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

• I really appreciate your efforts and your useful advices, but dont worry about me, this time it was a panorama picture, the next time it will be just another motive. If I'd want to do a image as you cropped it, I would have done it. But I wanted to do something different. As Taxiarchos wrote, the Uno-City has a wide range of motives and I live very close. Next time it might be winter, no flicker of the air, all razor sharp. Do not take this selection too seriously, it is not a competition. The results are now this way and another time for sure completely different. If I'd want to do, how you cropped it as a completely new picture, I would have done it by myself. But I just wanted to do something slightly different. I hope, you can accept it. --Hubertl (talk) 00:09, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

• I give up, xoxo. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 02:14, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support A very pleasant panorama at nice light, very carefully composed and at high detail quality. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:54, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Jee 03:22, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas