Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:2909 vallon moy res.jpg

Image:Vue en montant à Vallonpierre.jpg, not featured

•  Info created, uploaded by Berrucomons - nominated by Benh
•  Support The kind of scenery I always try to catch, not as beautifuly though :) -- Benh 17:07, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Neutral Jeehaa, i love the alps --Simonizer 17:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC) I have been a little fast with my support vote. I didnt recognize the CA in the snow areas. If this is corrected i will change to support again --Simonizer 09:27, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Neutral The background seems unfocused, could you try and downsample? --Digon3 ^talk 19:34, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support -- MJJR 20:43, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose It seems that the image is either i. not sharp or ii. upscaled. I think that it is the latter and we would need to nominate the original version. Freedom to share 21:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Strong colour fringing along upper mountain edge, particularly on left side of the image. There is a danger of mountain pictures being too easily accepted as having wow factor without sufficient consideration of technical and composition qualities. I would judge this image as being rather below the bar for each, regrettably. A nice enough photo though. --MichaelMaggs 21:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Agree with MichaelMaggs. All we have to do is to open the image in full resolution. Alvesgaspar 22:31, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Piffle. This shot is gorgeous and well-balanced. JaGa 05:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose ack MichaelMaggs despite definite wow. Lycaon 08:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 20:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Edit,featured

•  Info created, uploaded and edited by Berrucomons I did not nominate this picture because of technical imperfections. Apparently opposed voters agree with me on that. This downsampling is still a rather large picture, and looks more sharp at full resolution. Berrucomons 09:45, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I support this one too of course Benh 20:46, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Tone 12:07, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Both of the problems I mentioned above are still evident, I'm afraid. Sorry. --MichaelMaggs 21:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Neutral There is still CA at the snowborders --Simonizer 22:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support - That was a huge downsample, it would be preferable to start with less extreme measures. But the resulting image is technically good enough in my opinion, the purple fringing is minimal - Alvesgaspar 10:33, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

I am not very good at editing. I can manage things like levels, shadows/highlights, etc. but when it comes to CA, fringing or sharpness enhancement, I often am too heavy on the filters and make artifacts. Berrucomons 07:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

•  Support Better. --Digon3 ^talk 15:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Looking at this makes me feel like I'm standing there. Calibas 04:28, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Better indeed. Lycaon 12:35, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support of course JaGa 17:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Simonizer 20:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC)