Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Brown Hare444.jpg

Image:Brown Hare444.jpg, not featured

•  Info everything by Benjamint 04:13, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Benjamint 04:13, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support nice composition, perfect lighting, cute subject :-) --Ben^hello! 05:10, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support sharp, light. --Beyond silence 08:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support good cutting as well as sharply. — Manecke 09:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose poor composition and framing. Distracting background and cut-off subject. -- RedCoat 10:08, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Nice, sharp image reminiscent to the great wildlife photos of Fir0002. Are you and Peter related? :D Freedom to share 10:46, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• We're school friends, it was Peter that introduced me to wiki Benjamint 11:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
  • That explains a lot. Freedom to share 11:59, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --MichaelMaggs 12:12, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose ack Redcoat. Lycaon 13:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Very sharp. I prefer the composition of your other version. Acarpentier 16:25, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Framing is too tight. --Digon3 ^talk 21:40, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I originally nominated the previous version for QI, but this one is even better. Wonderful image - those few extra pixels really help. Doodle-doo Ħ 22:35, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Looks overexposed/oversharpened. JaGa 23:57, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose i dont like the composition --Richard Bartz 15:04, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I think this is a great image.. Ltshears 22:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose ack Redcoat --Leafnode 06:26, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose as Redcoat --Karelj 21:19, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support It looks well. Maybe it shouldn't be so sharp in the background, but this is also good. --Aktron 20:00, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

result: 10 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Cecil 13:14, 18 October 2007 (UTC)