Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:City lights in motion.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:City lights in motion.jpg, not featured
[edit]
- Self-nomination —RadRafe 4 July 2005 12:59 (UTC)
Support —RadRafe 4 July 2005 12:59 (UTC)
Neutral nice picture, but not really any information in it norro 4 July 2005 13:23 (UTC)
- Well, it does serve as an example of motion blur. —RadRafe 4 July 2005 13:54 (UTC)
- Hmmm, i didn't think about that... norro 4 July 2005 14:37 (UTC)
- Well, it does serve as an example of motion blur. —RadRafe 4 July 2005 13:54 (UTC)
Oppose LoopZilla 2005-07-04 14:32:12 (UTC)- Oppose --Quasipalm 4 July 2005 15:31 (UTC)
- Support Nice example of motion blur. —Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 5 July 2005 15:31 (UTC)
- Oppose, unintelligible -- Solipsist 5 July 2005 18:46 (UTC)
- Support - abstract, but nice. -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:30 (UTC)
- Oppose, not really a good example of motion blur. ed g2s • talk 6 July 2005 01:26 (UTC)
- Oppose a bad example of motion light. -PedroPVZ 6 July 2005 11:20 (UTC)
- Ed, Pedro, I'd like to hear your suggestions for a better one. —RadRafe 15:39, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- [1] if this had more moving cars it would be a nice example. BTW, it's my city. --PedroPVZ 05:38, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
- Ed, Pedro, I'd like to hear your suggestions for a better one. —RadRafe 15:39, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:59 (UTC)
- Oppose move the object, not wave the camera. Kind of funny... Darkone (¿!) 21:49, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
- I don't think there's enough late-night traffic in Prince George. —RadRafe 11:56, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Atamari 21:11, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 8 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 13:18, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
