Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Cunningham's skink444.jpg

Image:Cunningham's skink444.jpg, not featured

•  Info Benjamint 11:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Benjamint 11:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment, am I right that you've artificially blurred parts of the image? --Aqwis 12:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Not sure about the blur on the bottom... you could have smoothed it? But anyway, great picture! ;) -- Acarpentier 14:15, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Thermos 15:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Support nice shot --Simonizer 15:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't like the oof area at the bottom, and I'd like to see more of the animal. Dori - Talk 17:37, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I actually like the composition but the quality is not exceptional: sharpness and detail could be better and there are blown areas - Alvesgaspar 21:08, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj 21:31, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo 21:35, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose for mediocre quality (blurring). And are you sure about the identification? What are the references? I can only find dark individuals with pale spots for Egernia cunninghami ... Lycaon 22:37, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Artificial synthetic blur. --MichaelMaggs 22:51, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Lerdsuwa 06:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
• The ID is correct, I just looked it up in the book Reptiles and Amphibians of Australia by Harold Cogger to make doubly sure, it says the species is "subject to considerable geographic color and pattern variation." The blur at the bottom was another log a bit closer to me. The log was at an angle to me causing the areas to the left an right to be OOF, I did blur it a bit more - because the out OOF areas on the main log had a funny texture like heat-haze or something - but not noticeably so, just naturally looks a bit odd. Thanks for your interest everyone :) Benjamint 07:57, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Aqwis 13:06, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose detail, composition, dof --Beyond silence 16:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose sweet composition, 2 harsh lighting for me --Richard Bartz 00:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral =>  not featured. Lycaon 22:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)