Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Cut rat 2.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[edit]
Anatomical picture of a rat
  •  Nominate
startaq 00:45, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
  •  Support I'm not really sure about this one, the other featured pictures about animals are all more or less alive and nice to look at, but this is a really interesting view of the organs and inner structure of a rat. startaq 00:45, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Great pic, but too weird... -- Get_It (Talk) 01:16, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Unfortunetaly not a great pic. I'm missing the feet of the rat. I would also crop the gray surrounding (perhaps even copy some of the bottom of the pod onto it. If you want to show this object make sure that nothing else distracts the observer Andreas Tille 06:56, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I like when a photo is a challenge to what a featured pic is. The subject is controversial and I like the idea of making an interesting and nice photo of it, but unfortunately the photo itself is not very good - I agree with Andres Tilles comments. Regards Malene Thyssen 15:35, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose cut, bad angle norro 19:20, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Dude, I'm eating. Still, it is IMO a quality picture, you can see all the organs very well. Very descriptive. Jon Harald Søby\no na 19:22, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Opposea feet is not seen. And very gross and disturbing. :S-PedroPVZ 22:06, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose could have been better if seen from above. Could be elected but should be put with a disclaimer or/and inside a drop-down box to avoid shocking some people. However, could serve as a starting point to make a great vector picture of organs which would be less disturbing. Dake 00:15, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Unfortunately the composition isn't very good, but I don't think there is anything wrong with pictures like this. -- ADSR6581 17:42, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support. Good, educational, quality picture. What is considered to be so shocking here? Haven't you seen a cut rat before? If you are offended by this, can you cut a rat in a non-shocking way and take a picture to replace this one? Definitely support.—Ezhiki 14:42, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral --FML hi 17:50, 22 August 2005 (UTC) A water please? :/[reply]
  •  Oppose - I agree with Andreas - Rex 00:40, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support / tsca ✉ 10:37:49, 2005-08-26 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Normally I make a point of never voting to oppose, but in this case I will – expressly to discourage anybody from taking up Ezhiki's suggestion and cutting up more rats in 'less shocking' ways. It's my duty; I'm a vegetarian. :-) QuartierLatin1968 03:46, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose. Really good, but not perfect. --Hautala 13:19, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Very aesthetic :-) although I think enough animals are killed useless :-( Nepumuk 10:26, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
5 support, 10 Oppose, 1 Neutral => Not Featured--Shizhao 03:42, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/Image:Cut_rat_2.jpg&oldid=106427107"