Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Eye-diagram no circles border.svg

Image:Eye-diagram.svg

•  Info created by Chabacano - uploaded by Chabacano - nominated by Chabacano --Chabacano 12:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Chabacano 12:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --WarX 13:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC) wow
•  Support --MesserWoland Dyskusja 13:09, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Eye-catching ;) --norro 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Awesome and high quiality svg work. -- Drini 17:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support ... wow! ...♥♥♥ Cary "Bastiq▼e" Bass ^demandez 19:15, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support - Very good --Thermos 19:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC) Changed support for new version
•  Info I find the multiple circles round the numbers a bit overpowering, and I feel they detract from the image. Suggest simply getting rid of them, and leaving the numbers unadorned (that's standard practice in patent drawings which have to be technically clear). --MichaelMaggs 22:15, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Seconded. Especially since the numbers are not centered in the circles. ~ trialsanderrors 02:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Uhm. The numbers are centered in the svg. At least I see them centered here and in Inkscape. In the thumbnails they are not rendered accurately, I suppose :( Chabacano 11:11, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
      • Yeah, they're not properly rendered in any size other than the original. Thanks for removing. ~ trialsanderrors 16:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment The problem occurs because you use a different font and size when drawing this on your computer than the mediawiki software when rendering. This problem could be solved by converting the text to path (Inkscpae: “Path” -> “Object to Path”). --norro 12:41, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

• • • • Updated: Yes, that solution worked. Nice :) Chabacano 13:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Very precision work --Packa 23:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Atoma 09:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC) changed my support to the new edit --Atoma 13:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Simonizer 10:45, 8 March 2007 (UTC) changed my support to the new edit--Simonizer 11:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => Waiting for the result of the edit! Simonizer 10:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Edit: Border of the circles removed (right), featured

•  Info Borders of the circles removed. The circles, however, are still there. This voting page has white backrgound, but the numbers should be visible with any background (example)
•  Support --Chabacano 11:10, 8 March 2007 (UTC) The subject gets more attention without those borders.
•  Support --Simonizer 11:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support ¡Awesome! --Paintman 13:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Atoma 13:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support - Much better now - Alvesgaspar 13:19, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Ziga 13:56, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Arad 15:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support good point --Diligent 15:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Original was good, this is even better --Thermos 16:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support pile-on ~ trialsanderrors 16:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Agreed. Thanks for making the change. --MichaelMaggs 17:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent work. Jkelly 18:26, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Lestat 09:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice. --startaq 13:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support - ditto to everyone - MPF 23:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Though I still have a problem with the numbers in the white circles; however I don't see a solution at the moment. The image itself is very good of course. Lycaon 08:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Maire 15:17, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Tone 20:23, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Leafnode 11:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Not that this has any chance of failing, but a really exemplary diagram. Brighterorange 20:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Wing-Chi 20:03, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
•  Support // tsca [re] 15:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 08:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC)