Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Henry-Longfellow.png

Info created by ST - uploaded by ADuran after two half-images by nominator Adam Cuerden --Adam Cuerden 19:17, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Adam Cuerden 19:17, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great detail. --Beyond silence 01:11, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose And obvious moiré patterns in full resolution - Alvesgaspar 23:30, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Not Moire, I fear: It didn't print particularly well so the background is heavily artefacted. But, despite the funny printing - which does not, thankfully, affect Longfellow himself - it's better than any other image of Longfellow we have. Adam Cuerden 01:54, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The head is overexposed. This look like a scanning error though it must not be one. --Ikiwaner 22:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a photo, I think that is an only empty part as top of hand. --Beyond silence 23:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ay, that's just how they did engravings, though it was probably similar in the photograph: One of the reasons I like engravings for Victorian subjects is that photographs of that time are often in pretty bad shape by now, but the engravings keep very well, and often have more detail. Adam Cuerden 15:59, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose --Dezidor 21:28, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Please state your reason of opposition as a courtesy to the author. Lycaon 09:30, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 10:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu