Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:HerdenkingVuurgrensRotterdam1940 2007 edit1.jpg

*

Info created by Y.S. Groen - uploaded and nominated by Trebaxus22:32, 13 June 2007 (CET)

~~* Support~~ Move to right picture --Trebaxus 00:32, 13 June 2007 (CET)

Support --Mbz1 22:44, 13 June 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]
Support --Abehn 11:33, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's not sharp at all. I usually don't care for nightshots, but this one is special enough because of the subject matter. Still, any nightshot of a cityscape should be sharper than this, and we have other FPs that are, so there is no mitigating reason here. Unless the lights were moving, the ISO was also too high. -- Ram-Man 12:11, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not the lights (except one where vandals were moving with it), but the bridge was moving. This picture shot from the erasmus bridge in Rotterdam which moves quite a lot, espessialy because of the trams riding over it. The pictures in quality newspapers where often more unsharp than this one. Also because of the fog and the rain. -- Trebaxus 13:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brian67 15:12, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support /Daniel78 21:54, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~* Support~~ moving my vote to 3rd version. --Digon3 ^talk 14:41, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Wiki mouse 19:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => other versions has more support votes Simonizer 09:36, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Info created by Y.S. Groen - uploaded and nominated by Trebaxus15:39, 14 June 2007 (CET)
Support --Trebaxus 15:39, 14 June 2007 (CET)
For Ram-man a version with a lower ISO. -- Trebaxus 13:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 12:50, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Info - Sharpened. Noise reduced. Distortion corrected.
Support - Not the best edit but I gave it fast try. I think it's better than the original. --Arad 19:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj 20:56, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice — H92 (t · c · no) 21:02, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's better than the original for me too. Ceridwen 00:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Benjamint 09:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is better than the original. Although I might not normally support it, this needs enough votes to be successful. -- Ram-Man 12:11, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Digon3 ^talk 00:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trebaxus 11:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 12:51, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contents