Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Louvre 2007 02 24 c.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Louvre 2007 02 24 c.jpg, featured
[edit]- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Benh
- Info I finally got this picture undeleted (see here). As I said before, there is a case law which basically states that a picture of a copyrighted material and its bigger surrounding environnement doesn't violate copyrights. This issue was debated as well on french wikipedia and conclusion was the same. I let the previous votes for information, below. Benh 21:45, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support -- Benh 21:45, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- Info Discussion of some related legal issues is taking place at Commons talk:Licensing#Template:FoP-France. --MichaelMaggs 21:50, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose I didn't notice the ghost legs at first. --JaGa 00:02, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support --che 00:17, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support -- Lycaon 03:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Luc Viatour 06:40, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support great colour, composition and mood --Simonizer 09:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support good --Richard Bartz 11:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support--Mbz1 15:02, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Mbz1
- Oppose People ghosting way too disturbing (dangling feet), and it's also tilted clockwise. Dori | Talk 15:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- I don't see any tilt. Can you point the "litigious area", I just want to correct if there's an error, no argument here :). Maybe you are talking about the not horizontal line of the building in the back ? Because this is caused by the projection used (equirectangular here). Benh 18:28, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- It's a very slight tilt or appearance of tilt from that building in the background (with GIMP I measured it at 0.26 degrees :), it's the ghosts that bother me the most though as they're numerous and throughout the picture. Dori | Talk 23:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Since the legal issues are all worked out. --Digon3 talk 15:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Beyond silence 15:54, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose - Les fantômes me gênent un peu aussi. Est-ce qu'il y a un moyen facile de les éliminer? (back to English, uf) Also, the building is not razor sharp as it should: the worst part is at far right. Sorry to go against the concensus (and also against Benh who is doing an excellent job, hope he will be soon ready to join MOP) but I'm used to the perfect pano buildings of Dilif. Indeed there is a tilt but it is minor Alvesgaspar 16:31, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Une comparaison pas très juste ;) Actually, I felt into serious photography after having seen a Sydney harbour pano of Diliff. About my picture,I feel it's still sharp on right, so I'm a bit surprised ?? Maybe I'll try to get another shot of this with my new lens and at a more appropriate time. Hopefully, this will fix the issues mentionned above. Thanks for your encouraging comment by the way ! Benh 18:45, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Info I also think this is very good, and would definitely support were it not for the possible copyright issues. I hope we can sort those out to prove that images like this are definitely OK. --MichaelMaggs 19:59, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support I'm not a specialist in international or national copyright laws, but I can hardly believe that there could be a problem here. Despite the slightly disturbing 'ghosts', I think this image is FP worthy. -- MJJR 20:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Karelj 20:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Very good job. --LucaG 20:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Fabulous! -- Slaunger 21:14, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Great panoramic picture - Ceridwen 19:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Great! But, what about freedom of panorama in France? --Mihael Simonic 08:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support --AngMoKio 20:31, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
result: 15 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 16:42, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:Louvre 2007 02 24 c.jpg (for information only)
[edit]
Click on the blue triangle on the right to show disscussion